![]()
Note: Apparently there was a 5.0 version created for Amiga at some point, too. I do not believe this exercise is worth your while in emulation - seriously, what would be the point of that? If you do find ADFs out there and still have your old Amiga box, this is hands down the best Word Processor for you to use, in my opinion. If you find a copy (and ADFs are out there if you hunt) and still have your old Amiga nearby, give WordPerfect a try. Word processing on the Amiga can happen, be a total joy, and be transferable to modern storage media and word processors with most of the formatting perfectly in place. The UI is easily customizable to use a multitude of color schemes - even a very DOS-like one, if you prefer. Good lord the package felt like it was a solid brick! They didn’t mess around with the 3-ring binder manual. They wanted $150, but I somehow won it for only $20. Every month or two I would get an email alert letting me know someone was selling the original manual.īut then, suddenly, I was alerted to a complete box set, with all disks. This was far better than the Atari ST fared, for what it is worth.īut… where was one to find a physical copy today? Many moons ago, out of bored desperation, I created a Search Alert on Ebay in the off-chance a copy might show up. However, “hundreds of Amiga users called the company and left online messages saying they would be satisfied with a program like IBM WordPerfect 5.0.” (Quote from Compute! #111, August 1989.) WordPerfect Corp decided to continue to support the DOS-like program until 1992. #WORD PERFECT EMULATOR FOR MAC SOFTWARE#In 1989, the WordPerfect Corporation announced it would stop developing the software after having lost over $800,000 on the platform and fearing Amiga users simply had to have a GUI. ![]() At the time, WordPerfect was criticized for being a non-graphical word processor on a very high-end graphically oriented computer. It was very DOS-like in look and feel and was functionally much like WordStar in many respects. Originally, it sold for $395 on the Amiga (equivalent to just over $800 in 2016 dollars), so that didn’t help spread the program like wildfire, either. #WORD PERFECT EMULATOR FOR MAC UPDATE#It later shipped with a separate update disk that pushed it to 4.1.2, but it didn’t sell well at all. WordPerfect 4.1 for Amiga was released in 1987. It’s more like a myth than an actual product that ever existed, except we have magazines from the late 80s, like Amiga World, declaring WordPerfect’s brilliance as proof that it did indeed exist. ![]() WordPerfect for the Amiga was, or is, about as rare a creature to be found for the Amiga platform today on physical disks. WordPerfect always seemed to beckon, but was nowhere to be found. publisher, not a small shop or weekend warrior. But WordWorth 7 was developed for OS4, not 3.1 or earlier systems, and was on CD-ROM as well.ĭid a cross-platform Word Processor ever truly exist that could be used today, beyond what was discussed before under the required parameters? For what it’s worth, many of the afore mentioned classic word processors were fine for the Amiga back in the day when you never needed to leave the system.Įver since this quest began, in the back of my mind I knew if there was any chance of finding the right software package it was likely to come from a larger U.S. It was developed up to version 7 in 1998 four years after Commodore ceased to exist. #WORD PERFECT EMULATOR FOR MAC PLUS#WordWorth was by far the most capable technologically, but still horrible on the eyes and rather clunky in the UI department - plus it was intended for A1200 hardware and beyond. We looked at several packages that can still be found and used on original Amiga hardware, including: TextCraft, Excellence and WordWorth 4SE. #WORD PERFECT EMULATOR FOR MAC PC#The saved text file should be able to be created on the Amiga and easily transferred to a PC or Mac, with very little “fixing” needed between platforms. Paragraph breaks are an absolute must, of course. At a minimum this would include bold, italics, underlining, paragraph tabbing and other basic formatting. compugraphic) fonts were very hard on the eyes and made real writing a huge issue (for this author, at least). The Amiga’s bitmap screen font is a very easy to read font. We needed something that provided “three legs to support the stool”, which included George Martin on MS-DOS, and didn't feel like complete work to use. The only real missing piece, for this reviewer, was actual software that hit “all the right buttons”, much like WordStar did for Mr. ![]() (Generally, “classic” refers to machines running OS 1.x - 3.1.) You may recall in a previous post we raised the various merits of using a classic Amiga computer for Word processing for day-to-day writing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |